Saturday 9 September

Debride or not debride: when and how?

Jyrki Vuola, Helsinki, Finland

The debridement of a burn wound can help promote healing and prevent infection. Whether or not debridement is necessary and the specific method used depends on various factors, such as the type of wound, its depth, the extent of tissue damage, and the patient’s overall condition.

Jyrki Vuola will discuss the elements to evaluate while deciding the best treatment for a burn wound, presenting interactive clinical cases, and using a multidisciplinary approach.

Participation is free, but space is limited!

Please register now to secure your spot (with coffee and French croissant included!)

Jyrki Vuola

O4.1.1 The study of using medical honey dressing compared to stapler for skin graft fixation in burn wounds

Sheyda Rimaz, Iran

O4.1.2 Management and outcomes of SJS/TEN in a regional burn’s unit in Northern Ireland

Lydia De Carvalho, United Kingdom

O4.1.3 The efficiency of enzymatic debridement combined with negative pressure wound therapy for deep burns treatment – a clinical study

Camelia Tamas,Romania

O4.1.4 Coverage of the hand and forearm in the electrical burn

Sung Won Jung, South Korea

O4.1.5 Nexobrid off-label use in the elderly in vall d’hebron burns unit

Alexander Lugilde Guerbek, Spain

O4.1.6 Facial burns – refined clinical pathway of conservative treatment

Albin Stritar, Slovenia

O4.1.7 Epicite (nanocellulose biotechnologically manufacture) as a first-line dressing, followed by Epifast (Cryopreserved Cultured Keratinocytes Sheet able to release grow factors) in second-degree burns.

Pablo Rodriguez-ferreyra, Mexico

O4.2.1 Major Burn Simulation Training: setting up a regional course

Samar Mousa, United Kingdom

O4.2.2 Assessing activity of the French Military Burn Center during the COVID-19 pandemic 2019-2022

Nicolas Donat, France

O4.2.3 Survey on the present burn care facilities and retrospective analysis of burn injury incidence in Greece: data from a multicenter study, stressing the need of initiating a National Burn Registry

Eirini Nikolaidou, Greece

O4.2.4 Thirty-six years of BABI plan: accomplishments and developments of the Belgian mass burn casualty disaster plan

Serge Jennes, Belgium

O4.2.6 Impact of decreasing burn bed capacity on non-admission rates: a 7-year retrospective study in a French military burn centre

Nicolas Donat, France

O4.2.7 Influence of electron beam irradiation on extracellular matrix of the human allogeneic skin grafts

Wojciech Łabuś, Poland

O4.3.1 Non-invasive physical plasma of helium (generating highly reactive oxygen and nitrogen species) application as an adjuvant treatment of Epifast in superficial and deep second-degree burns

Pablo Rodriguez-ferreyra, Mexico

O4.3.2 Retrospective analysis study: enzymatic debridement (ED) in large burn patients

Jasminka Minic, Italy

O4.3.3 Utilizing Unsupervised Clustering and Latent Class Analysis to Evaluate Clinical Heterogeneity and Predict Mortality in Severely Burned Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Jaechul Yoon, South Korea

O4.3.4 Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula in critical burn patient during deep sedation in enzymatic bromelain debridement (Nexobrid®): preliminary report

Antonio Tomasello, Italy

O4.3.5 Severe methemoglobinemia after using a local anesthetic in a child with a burn

Serhii Yehorov, Ukraine

O4.3.6 Bench-to-bedside assessment: high-dose vitamin C therapy In burn patients with septic shock

Amel Mokline, Tunesia

Ethical Dilemmas in Burn Care

Thomas Leclerc, France | Folke Sjöberg, Sweden | George Agich, United States (video)

Working together: Interprofessional communication the key to success in burn care

Frank Faulhaber, Switserland | Elvira Lang, United States | David Harrington, United Kingdom

Effective interprofessional communication is essential to success in burn care. By working together, healthcare professionals can provide patients with the comprehensive care they need to recover from burn injuries and achieve the best possible outcomes.

We all want the best outcomes for our patients, and this can be achieved by sharing information, exchanging knowledge and experience, and collaborating on patient care plans.

What is the best way to communicate?

Moderators: Jill Meirte & Sophie Böttcher

The session will start with an opening panel discussion: Teresa Tredoux, Folke Sjöberg and Peter Dziewuski

Frank Faulhaber and Yvonne Kröger, Zurich, Switzerland on The role of interprofessional communication in prevention of critical incidences

Elvira Lang, Cambridge, United States on Communication and team interactions to improve quality of care

David Harrington, Providence, United Kingdom on How soft skills should be integrated in the burn care professional’s training

Discussion

David Harrington

Frank Faulhaber

Yvonne Kröger